The rush to produce green steel
In the city of Woburn, Massachusetts, a suburb just north of Boston, a cadre of engineers and scientists in white coats inspected an orderly stack of brick-sized, gunmetal-gray steel ingots on a desk inside a neon-illuminated lab space.
What they were looking at was a batch of steel created using an innovative manufacturing method, one that Boston Metal, a company that spun out a decade ago from MIT, hopes will dramatically reshape the way the alloy has been made for centuries. By using electricity to separate iron from its ore, the firm claims it can make steel without releasing carbon dioxide, offering a path to cleaning up one of the world‘s worst industries for greenhouse gas emissions.
An essential input for engineering and construction, steel is one of the most popular industrial materials in the world, with more than <a href="https://statista.com/statistics/267264/ world-crude- steel-production/”>2 billion tons produced annually. This abundance, however, comes at a steep price for the env ironment. Steelmaking accounts for <a href="https:// globalefficiencyintel.com/new-blog/2021/ global– steel-industrys-ghg- emissions“>7 to 11 percent of global greenhouse-gas emissions, making it one of the largest industrial sources of atmospheric pollution. And because production could <a href="https://sei.org/publications/net-zero-de carbonising- steel-by-2050/”>rise by a third by 2050, this env ironmental burden could grow.
That poses a significant challenge for tackling the climate crisis. The United Nations says significantly cutting industrial carbon emissions is essential to keeping global warming under the 1.5^0 Celsius mark set under the 2015 Paris climate agreement. To do so, emissions from steel and other heavy industries will have to fall by 93 percent by 2050, according to estimates by the International Energy Agency.
Facing escalating pressure from governments and investors to reduce emissions, a number of steelmakers-including both major producers and startups-are experimenting with low- carbon technologies that use hydrogen or electricity instead of traditional carbon– intensive manufacturing. Some of these efforts are nearing commercial reality.
“What we are talking about is a capital- intensive, risk-averse industry where disruption is extremely rare,” said Chris Bataille, an energy economist at IDDRI, a Paris-based research think tank. Therefore, he added, “it’s exciting” that there’s so much going on all at once.
Still, experts agree that transforming a global industry that turned over <a href="https:// world steel.org/media-centre/press-releases/2019/ world– steel-in-figures-2019-now-available/”>$2.5 trillion in 2017 and employs more than <a href="https:// world steel.org/about- steel/ steel-industry-facts/”>6 million people will take enormous effort. Beyond the practical obstacles to scaling up novel processes in time to reach global climate goals, there are concerns about China, where over half the world‘s steel is made and whose plans to de carbonize the steel sector remain vague.
“It’s certainly not an easy fix to de carbonize an industry like this,” said Bataille. “But there’s no choice. The future of the sector-and that of our climate-depends on just that.”
Modern steelmaking involves several production stages. Most commonly, iron ore is crushed and turned into sinter (a rough solid) or pellets. Separately, coal is baked and converted into coke. The ore and coke are then mixed with limestone and fed into a large blast furnace where a flow of extremely hot air is introduced from the bottom. Under high temperatures, the coke burns and the mixture produces liquid iron, known as pig iron or blast– furnace iron. The molten material then goes into an oxygen furnace, where it’s blasted with pure oxygen through a water-cooled lance, which forces off carbon to leave crude steel as a final product.
This method, first patented by English engineer Henry Bessemer in the 1850s, produces carbon-dioxide emissions in different ways. First, the chemical reactions in the blast furnace result in emissions, as carbon trapped in coke and limestone binds with oxygen in the air to create carbon dioxide as a byproduct. In addition, fossil fuels are typically burned to heat the blast furnace and to power sintering and pelletizing plants, as well as coke ovens, emitting carbon dioxide in the process.
<a href="https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/ global/Documents/Manufacturing/gx_remaking%20the%20 global%20 steel%20industry_06_13.pdf”>As much as 70 percent of the world‘s steel is produced this way, generating <a href="https:// world steel.org/publications/policy-papers/climate-change-policy-paper/”>nearly two tons of carbon dioxide for each ton of steel produced. The <a href="https://recyclingtoday.com/article/the-growth-of-eaf- steelmaking/”>remaining 30 percent is almost all made through electric arc furnaces, which use an electrical current to melt steel-largely recycled scrap-and have <a href="https://gmh-gruppe.de/de-en/green- steel/electric- steelmaking-our-key-technology.html”>far lower CO emissions than blast furnaces.
But because of the limited scrap supply, not all future demand can be met this way, said Jeffrey Rissman, an industry program director and head of modeling at the San Francisco-based energy and climate policy firm Energy Innovation. With the right policies in place, recycling could supply up to 45 percent of global demand in 2050, he said. “The rest will be satisfied by forging primary ore-based steel, which is where most emissions come from.”
So, “if the steel industry is serious” about its climate commitments, he added, “it will have to fundamentally reshape the way the material is made-and do so fairly quickly.”